Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Sermon for Wednesday Interfaith Lenten Series Matt 26:69-75 “Fallible”



We’ve been watching the news casts from Rome in recent days. 115 cardinals gathered there to elect a new pope. Each day, we were watching to see the smoke. Was it black? Was it white? Does the Roman Catholic Church have a new pope or not? A wag on the internet posted a guide to conclave smoke, offering some different smoke color options: red means a cardinal has gone missing, brown means an espresso break, yellow means a cardinal has left the lights of his car on and so forth…it’s funny stuff, culminating finally in what it means if there is pink smoke: Hello Kitty has been elected pope!

This afternoon, we saw white smoke, and discovered that the new Pope is Pope Francis, a Jesuit from Argentina originally named Jorge Bergoglio, the Archbishop of Buenos Aires, a man who rides the local public transit system to get around the city. We pray for him, and for the Catholic Church in this time of transition.

We laughed at the talk of Hello Kitty smoke, but we also knew that this was serious business, this electing of a pope, the spiritual leader of some 1.2 billion Catholics in the world. Popes have been game-changers in the world: look at John Paul II and his opposition to the Marxist regimes in the Soviet Union. For some of us from other denominations, the actions of Popes have triggered the birth of a new denomination: Clement VII’s unwillingness to grant Henry VIII an annulment of his marriage to Catherine of Aragon led to Henry pronouncing himself supreme head of the church in England, which led to the birthing of the Church of England, and eventually to the Episcopal Church in which I serve. 

             Popes are important, whether we are Catholic or not, and one of the many titles they bear is a particularly ancient one: successor to St Peter, the Bishop of Rome.
            This is, of course, the same Peter that Jesus named as the rock upon which he would build his church. The same Peter who, just a bit later, riled up Jesus so thoroughly that the Lord said “Get behind me, Satan!” The same Peter who, in the gospel passage we just heard, so miserably failed in the time of crisis by hiding and pretending that he wasn’t one of those followers of the Lord, by denying him not once, not twice, but three times.

            The man who often didn’t understand what it was that Jesus was saying…a humble man, most likely without much in education. A fisherman. Probably a good fisherman, but still…a fisherman, not a rocket scientist. Not a theologian. Not ordained. Utterly ordinary. A guy in homespun clothes that probably still smelled of pickerel and perch, a man with a bit of a temper when upset, a passionate man whose emotions sometimes got the better of him, but a solid buddy who would lend a hand if you needed it.
             Compare that to the candidates for successor to Peter in Rome. These men who hold advanced degrees in theology and related disciplines, who write learned articles and books, who dress in the finest satin and silk and lace, these careful and faithful men who probably never set a fishing net in the water or tied a knot other than that of their cinctures…they are careful not to appear too hungry for the title – the saying is “Go in a pope, go out a cardinal. Go in a cardinal, come out a pope.” Appearing to be vying for the papacy is apparently unseemly. But there are conversations, and there are thoughts about who might take on this complex and difficult task of leading the church…to be a new rock upon which the church will rest for the next decades. Some favor a strong reformer/administrator type. Some favor someone from the parts of the world where the church is growing the fastest. Some want a pope with a deep heart, and all of this plays into the voting, I would expect.

               But none of them smells like perch or pickerel. None of them has rough hands from the labor of tying and tossing and pulling the nets and wrangling the boat across rough waters. The successor to Peter will most likely not seem like Peter – that diamond in the rough fisherman – at all.
And yet we look back at the story of that fisherman that we just heard and we see such interesting glimpses into the man.
              It is Peter at his weakest. He thought he’d be brave after Jesus told them all of what was coming. He thought he’d defend Jesus to the end. At the last supper, when Jesus said that they would all fail him, Peter defended himself: “Even though I must die with you, I will not deny you.”
You can picture him, can’t you? Jesus said they would fail him. They all said, “No, no, not me!” You can see how red Peter is, the hot blood creeping up from his neck to suffuse his whole face – even his ears are now bright red with hot temper – and he cries out “Even though I must die with you, I will not deny you.”

              But then the story unfolds, and Peter and James and John accompany Jesus to Gethsemane. Do they stand guard to protect him as he prays? No.

               They fall asleep.
               Even Peter, the rock, the hot-tempered man who has sworn his allegiance, now dozes in the garden. Even the man who was so offended that Jesus would suggest that he would abandon the Lord, snores as he leans against a rock.

               An ordinary man, this Peter, with all the human failings that we recognize in ourselves: egotism, anger, pride…a man who sometimes says thoughtless things, who makes promises that he clearly cannot keep. This Peter. This rock, upon whom Jesus has built his church.

              I think that when we hear the story of Peter denying Jesus – “No, I do not know the man!” – it makes us intensely uncomfortable, because it feels so much like what we would do if we were in his position. If we were afraid. If we felt like an outlaw. If we were challenged by people who would gladly turn us in to our enemies for a few coins. We might find ourselves with not a drop of courage in our veins in that moment…
             And then we say to ourselves, “Well, we will never be in that situation, so I guess we’re safe. We will never be tested in that way.”

              We breathe a sigh of relief, thinking, “No, I am not like Peter.”
 
              But is that really true?

             When does our courage fail us? When do we deny the Lord, even after we have sworn that we will not fail him?

              When someone tells a joke at the expense of another, perhaps playing on that person’s ethnicity or skin color, we deny the Christ who taught us that we are all beloved of God. When we see the opportunity to help someone in need, and we stop short, thinking that the person makes us nervous because she doesn’t talk like us or smells bad, we deny the Christ who said that we are to help others. When we say that those who are hurting should shape up, pull themselves up by their bootstraps, get themselves a job, because doesn’t it say that “the Lord helps those who help themselves,” we deny the Christ who said that even an adulteress didn’t deserve to be stoned, even a demoniac deserved relief from his demons, even the child of an enemy should be healed…

               We are all Peter. We are all Peter, hiding in a courtyard, saying “I do not know the man.” True words, because if we truly knew the man, we wouldn’t deny him.

               But if Peter’s story ended with his ignominious denials, we would miss out on the most important part of what this story and this man is about.
               Yes, Peter denied his Lord, the same Lord he cherished above all others. Yes, his shame was great, and he wept for it. But he gathered himself afterwards. He joined with the other disciples. He became something more than the craven who denied Christ…he became the rock upon whom the church was built. This ordinary, flawed, uneducated, hot-tempered man who failed at the moment of greatest crisis became the leader of a religious movement that reshaped the world. His leadership was not perfect – he regularly got into disputes with others, no surprise there – but it was faithful and powerful, as attested to in the Acts of the Apostles.  

                Peter grew into being the rock. It wasn’t an elegantly sculpted piece of marble, like the statues in St Peter’s in Rome. It was a rough-hewn imperfect solid chunk of strength. But it was solid and strong and unshakeable. He grew into being a rock, being The Rock.

                I expect that those 115 cardinals in the papal conclave, voting on who will be the next successor to Peter, are painfully aware of their imperfections. They know that any of them, should they be elected pope, will bring their brokenness as well as their gifts. Silks and satins and lace may cover the exterior flaws, but their humanity will still remain. But they pray that the one whom they elect will grow into the task, as Peter grew into being the rock
 .
                We share much of the same struggle, even though we aren’t about electing a pope. We know we would  be as likely to deny Christ as we would defend him, if we were afraid. We know that we are imperfect followers.
               
                  But the lesson of Peter, who failed but still persevered, is that imperfect followers can learn and grow and become, if not perfect Christians, at least better at following the task that our Lord set before us when he set his eyes on Jerusalem.

                  You are the rock. Upon you, I build my church.
Amen.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Sermon For Sunday March 10, 2013, Lent IV Luke 15:1-3, 11b-32 “Prodigal Father”



The prodigal son. The bad boy who decided he didn’t want to stay at home on the family farm. The kid who was bored and itching to go out into the world. What an idiot!

He asked his father for his inheritance ahead of time, essentially saying “you’re not dying fast enough for my plans, so give me the money now”, went out to see the world and experience something beyond the farm, spent all the money he had gotten on wine, women and song, realized he had made a major mistake, and came home, asking his father’s forgiveness.

Yup, we know the story.

And we hear the word “prodigal,” and we think that it modifies the word “son.” Well, it does. It means “spending money recklessly and freely.” Sure sounds like the wild boy.

I expect we know someone like this – everyone does, it seems. We may have been that boy ourselves.  It’s a common theme in movies and novels, and in life: we have to leave home to appreciate what we have at home, and we have to make a few mistakes along the way. We may not have done it in as dramatic a way as the bad boy in today’s tale, but we recognize the urge, even as we may judge.

This kind of behavior is usually associated with a young person (or a middle-aged person, sometimes) saying “Who am I? No really…who am I?” and then the person goes out and acts in an irresponsible way to test out their perception of who they are.

Perhaps our bad boy thought “I’m not really a farmer-type. I’m a city boy. I’m a party boy. I’m a playboy. I just need to go live that life!”

So he got the cash and went to fulfill his vision of who he thought he was…until it all fell apart. And in that moment, something happened. The Gospel says “he came to himself.” It’s as if the veil fell from his eyes and he realized that he was not the crazy playboy city party guy…he was simply his father’s son. He came to himself, and realized that he had made a mess of things, and he wanted to go home.

Like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz, he wanted to click his heels and say “there’s no place like home.”  

So he went home again, not knowing quite what he would find there. He had squandered his inheritance, he had acted like an obnoxious fool, he had insulted his father, and by extension, his whole family, by abandoning them. It would serve him right if they made him lower than the lowest slave. They owed him nothing.

But what was the response when he approached his father’s land? Not scorn. Not excoriation. Not a snub and the words “you are dead to me.”

No, his father was as prodigal with his forgiveness as the son had been with the spending of his inheritance. It was a reckless, wildly over-the-top forgiveness, as incomprehensible and illogical in its way as the son’s behavior was. He forgave the boy’s rude and heartless demand for his inheritance ahead of time. He forgave the son wasting his money on profligate living, living in a manner that rendered him ritually unclean. He forgave his son coming home with nothing to show for his adventure but pig waste under his fingernails. And this father not only forgave, but he celebrated the boy! A party!

Why? Because the boy finally came to his senses. He finally came to himself, and in coming to himself, he realized what truly mattered.

A prodigal forgiveness, beyond what any son like this one would rightfully expect for the sins he had committed.

And we think of this story of prodigal forgiveness as a marker of the new covenant that Jesus brought, a shift in mood from the Old Testament where God exacted fearful judgment on his people…

…and yet it isn’t that simple.

Look at our Old Testament reading this morning. We hear the dialogue between the Lord and Joshua, as the Israelites arrive in Canaan. This is the first generation of Israelites who have no memory of Egypt. They are landed in their promised land. There is no more need for manna. They have finally and truly been released from their slavery, and God says to Joshua “Today I have rolled from you the disgrace of Egypt.” Prodigal redemption from a prodigal father who loved his children despite all their murmurings, their complaints, their infidelity to him over the years of wandering. There is no love to compare to the prodigal love of such a father…

…unless we see the prodigal love that is demonstrated when the Psalmist tells his story: “Then I acknowledged my sin to you, and did not conceal my guilt. I said, ‘I will confess my transgressions to the LORD.’ Then you forgave me the guilt of my sin.” And who is this prodigal son, this psalmist who asks the Lord’s forgiveness? King David, regretting his sin of the murder of his lover’s husband. Talk about reckless, prodigal squandering of the inheritance of God’s blessing! And talk about the even more wildly reckless and prodigal forgiveness, spoken of in this psalm in such understated terms!

This God of the Old Testament forgives exactly as Jesus described in the parable from Luke: love trumps punishment. Forgiveness trumps recompense. Yes, God judges, but if we acknowledge our sin and ask for forgiveness, God forgives. And forgives. And forgives. The God of second chances, and third, and fourth, and fortieth.

If we have spent the previous weeks of Lent reflecting on who we are, and have seen where we have failed, where we have not lived into our promise as God’s beloved children, we have the prescription for the cure here: ask for God’s forgiveness. God gives it. It is as simple as that. God gives it. God sets a table for us as we come to ourselves once again, a table around which we will gather in a few minutes, a table where all of us, the prodigals of every stripe, are welcome, a table where we will be fed in ways that will help us to live into our best selves. We, too, will experience a resurrection as we join God at the table. All because of a prodigal father and his prodigal forgiveness.

Amen.


Sermon For Sunday March 10, 2013, Lent IV Luke 15:1-3, 11b-32 “Prodigal Father”




The prodigal son. The bad boy who decided he didn’t want to stay at home on the family farm. The kid who was bored and itching to go out into the world. What an idiot!

He asked his father for his inheritance ahead of time, essentially saying “you’re not dying fast enough for my plans, so give me the money now”, went out to see the world and experience something beyond the farm, spent all the money he had gotten on wine, women and song, realized he had made a major mistake, and came home, asking his father’s forgiveness.

Yup, we know the story.

And we hear the word “prodigal,” and we think that it modifies the word “son.” Well, it does. It means “spending money recklessly and freely.” Sure sounds like the wild boy.

I expect we know someone like this – everyone does, it seems. We may have been that boy ourselves.  It’s a common theme in movies and novels, and in life: we have to leave home to appreciate what we have at home, and we have to make a few mistakes along the way. We may not have done it in as dramatic a way as the bad boy in today’s tale, but we recognize the urge, even as we may judge.

This kind of behavior is usually associated with a young person (or a middle-aged person, sometimes) saying “Who am I? No really…who am I?” and then the person goes out and acts in an irresponsible way to test out their perception of who they are.

Perhaps our bad boy thought “I’m not really a farmer-type. I’m a city boy. I’m a party boy. I’m a playboy. I just need to go live that life!”

So he got the cash and went to fulfill his vision of who he thought he was…until it all fell apart. And in that moment, something happened. The Gospel says “he came to himself.” It’s as if the veil fell from his eyes and he realized that he was not the crazy playboy city party guy…he was simply his father’s son. He came to himself, and realized that he had made a mess of things, and he wanted to go home.

Like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz, he wanted to click his heels and say “there’s no place like home.”  

So he went home again, not knowing quite what he would find there. He had squandered his inheritance, he had acted like an obnoxious fool, he had insulted his father, and by extension, his whole family, by abandoning them. It would serve him right if they made him lower than the lowest slave. They owed him nothing.

But what was the response when he approached his father’s land? Not scorn. Not excoriation. Not a snub and the words “you are dead to me.”

No, his father was as prodigal with his forgiveness as the son had been with the spending of his inheritance. It was a reckless, wildly over-the-top forgiveness, as incomprehensible and illogical in its way as the son’s behavior was. He forgave the boy’s rude and heartless demand for his inheritance ahead of time. He forgave the son wasting his money on profligate living, living in a manner that rendered him ritually unclean. He forgave his son coming home with nothing to show for his adventure but pig waste under his fingernails. And this father not only forgave, but he celebrated the boy! A party!

Why? Because the boy finally came to his senses. He finally came to himself, and in coming to himself, he realized what truly mattered.

A prodigal forgiveness, beyond what any son like this one would rightfully expect for the sins he had committed.

And we think of this story of prodigal forgiveness as a marker of the new covenant that Jesus brought, a shift in mood from the Old Testament where God exacted fearful judgment on his people…

…and yet it isn’t that simple.

Look at our Old Testament reading this morning. We hear the dialogue between the Lord and Joshua, as the Israelites arrive in Canaan. This is the first generation of Israelites who have no memory of Egypt. They are landed in their promised land. There is no more need for manna. They have finally and truly been released from their slavery, and God says to Joshua “Today I have rolled from you the disgrace of Egypt.” Prodigal redemption from a prodigal father who loved his children despite all their murmurings, their complaints, their infidelity to him over the years of wandering. There is no love to compare to the prodigal love of such a father…

…unless we see the prodigal love that is demonstrated when the Psalmist tells his story: “Then I acknowledged my sin to you, and did not conceal my guilt. I said, ‘I will confess my transgressions to the LORD.’ Then you forgave me the guilt of my sin.” And who is this prodigal son, this psalmist who asks the Lord’s forgiveness? King David, regretting his sin of the murder of his lover’s husband. Talk about reckless, prodigal squandering of the inheritance of God’s blessing! And talk about the even more wildly reckless and prodigal forgiveness, spoken of in this psalm in such understated terms!


This God of the Old Testament forgives exactly as Jesus described in the parable from Luke: love trumps punishment. Forgiveness trumps recompense. Yes, God judges, but if we acknowledge our sin and ask for forgiveness, God forgives. And forgives. And forgives. The God of second chances, and third, and fourth, and fortieth.

If we have spent the previous weeks of Lent reflecting on who we are, and have seen where we have failed, where we have not lived into our promise as God’s beloved children, we have the prescription for the cure here: ask for God’s forgiveness. God gives it. It is as simple as that. God gives it. God sets a table for us as we come to ourselves once again, a table around which we will gather in a few minutes, a table where all of us, the prodigals of every stripe, are welcome, a table where we will be fed in ways that will help us to live into our best selves. We, too, will experience a resurrection as we join God at the table. All because of a prodigal father and his prodigal forgiveness.

Amen.

 Art: "2 Sons" by Ron DiCianni

Tuesday, March 05, 2013

Responsibility

I tend to try to power through when I'm sick. You know how it goes - you take some over-the-counter meds and you take a deep breath and you go do what you're scheduled to do, even though you feel awful.

I did it again this past weekend. We had our parish Women's Retreat and I led it. Good material on Benedictine Rule of Life and how we in our everyday lives can construct a rule of life based on Benedict's principles even though we aren't monks. I felt lousy before I went. I felt lousy through the retreat. I came home feeling lousy. I did an adequate job, but was certainly not as present as I wished I had been. But the deposit had been paid, the women were expecting me, it was not re-schedule-able, and I felt obligated to do it. This is one of the downsides of being solo clergy: often, there is no one else to do something that needs to be done.

I came home late Saturday afternoon, put on my jammies and crashed. Actually cooked some dinner, simply because it was easier than thinking of what I would ask PH to make for us, ate a little bit, and went to sleep.

Sunday came. The good news is that the sermon was written and the adult forum was prepared. I suppose I could have asked my deacon to lead Morning Prayer and just read the sermon, but I felt the weight of responsibility, so I took my meds and headed in and led two services and adult forum. Afterwards, I went home and crashed, again. Hacked and coughed like Mimi in "Rent" or "La Boheme" (depending on your cultural orientation).

So I took yesterday off. I did my Skype session for my independent study, but mostly I just slept. And today I am also taking off, and doing one tiny bit of writing but otherwise nothing. Cancelled a morning meeting. I'm feeling slightly guilty, but only slightly. I am too ill to manage much more than that.

I have some colleagues who would applaud my going in and doing the retreat and the Sunday services. They tend to also be the same folks who never cancel services in a blizzard. They usually post some sort of notice on their website or FB page saying "Please use your own discretion in deciding whether or not to join me in our morning services." Of course, it is usually the elderly faithful who come no matter what weather, simply because their priest is there. The same elderly faithful who would be most likely to have an accident in icy conditions or who could fall and break a hip on the walk. They and I generally don't agree on the topic of cancelling services, and for some of them, it is relatively easy to say "I'll be there" since they live in a rectory on the grounds of the church property. Suffice to say we disagree as to what faithfulness to our call looks like.

I do cancel services (rarely, given our weather here in the Capital of the Confederacy) if I believe it will be unsafe for parishioners, especially our elderly ones, to drive. It feels like the responsible thing to do.

But I wonder if I am being equally responsible when it comes to pushing myself through even when I'm really sick. I am well aware of disease being passed from one person to another, and I take care about contact with others when I'm sick. But it feels sometimes like I think that I'm the only one who can do stuff, so I do even when I shouldn't. And while that is sometimes true, it is not ALWAYS true. So maybe it is sometimes about ego, about worrying if people will judge if I am not there...

I'm glad I stayed home these past two days. It feels like the responsible thing to do. It was easier, since it was not Sunday, nor were there critically important meetings. Maybe I can be equally responsible if necessary, even on a Sunday...

Sunday, March 03, 2013

Sermon for Sunday, March 3, 2013 Lent III Luke 13:1-9 “Oneof These Things Is Not Like the Other”



It is a fact. Study the Bible, and you can look at things over and over again and you see what you expect to see, what you’ve always seen, but the truth is that you have been missing something that you should have noticed.
I like to think that I’m a halfway decent student of Scripture, but I am as likely to miss something surprising and completely obvious in the Bible as the next person. So when I began my preparation on today’s gospel, I immediately thought of the way that Jesus uses this parable of the fig tree to talk about fruitfulness and about penitence. I was in good company – most of the commentaries on the parable say pretty much the same thing. Nothing surprising there – this is a message that Jesus says either directly or through parables elsewhere in the gospels.
But I was missing something. Something I hadn’t noticed before. So much for being a smarty-pants Biblical scholar.
I didn’t notice it until it was mentioned by a colleague, the Rev Eric Law, an Asian-American priest who works on the West Coast. Eric was leading a Bible study on today’s gospel passage with a group of Chinese refugees. One of the people in the group posed a question: “What’s a fig tree doing in a vineyard?”
Wow. The obvious question, and one that no one ever posed before. What’s a fig tree doing in a vineyard? If you’ve ever gone on one of those winery tours, you’ll see row upon row of well-tended vines, beautifully supported by trellises or frames. Occasionally, you will see a rose bush planted at each end of a row of vines, a tradition that was brought from France. But you will never see another plant that will take nutrients from the soil that could benefit the grapevines. A grower would not compromise his plantings by throwing a wild card into the ground, and a fig tree could be considered such a wild card.
What is a fig tree doing in a vineyard? It doesn’t belong there. It is like the old children’s game “one of these things is not like the other.” The fig tree doesn’t belong there.
But let’s assume, at this stage of this sermon, that the grower had his reasons for planting the fig tree in the vineyard. Maybe he didn’t have another spot for it, maybe he just didn’t think much about it and just plopped it there on a hot afternoon when he didn’t have the energy to put it in its proper place.
The grower goes out into the vineyard, sees that fig tree there, and is aggravated, because this is the third year that tree has leafed out, but it still hasn’t fruited.
Now imagine you’re living in a hot place, where water is at a premium. For three years you’ve waited for this tree to offer you something in return for the nurturing and water…and you’ve gotten not a single fig. You can taste the rich luscious sweetness in your imagination, but you sure can’t taste it in real life, because this useless tree still hasn’t produced a single fig. Can you feel the frustration and annoyance that the grower is feeling? So, not surprisingly, the grower says to his gardener, “Trash that tree. It is a waste of land and water.”
Makes sense, doesn’t it? Why would you keep such a fruitless tree in your yard? And it isn’t entirely out of character for a grower to do that. After all, every year he instructs his gardener to prune the grapevines, so that they might be more fruitful. It’s a common practice – indeed, it is one that is encouraged for grapes - to get rid of dead vines that no longer produce. So why not yank that fig tree out of the ground and toss it on the compost pile?
The gardener has another idea. “Sir, let me nurture it for another year, put manure around it, give it some extra water. I think if we are patient, it will fruit next year. And if it doesn’t, I will dispose of it as you wish.”
The gardener wants to give the fig tree one more chance to do what it is meant to do, to be fruitful.
Jesus doesn’t tell us what the grower says in response to this request – we presume he grudgingly agrees. He has his doubts, but he thinks “what can it harm me to give it one more year?”
One more chance.  
Now here’s where it gets interesting, because I want to loop back to that Bible study that Father Eric was leading. The same person who asked why a fig tree was in the vineyard asked another question. “’What kind of fruit is this man looking for?’  He continued his inquiry. ‘If he is looking for grapes, he isn’t going to find any.  Besides, the Chinese name of fig is no-flower fruit; so a fig tree bears fruit very differently from the grapevines.’”[1]
Maybe the grower was expecting his fig tree to produce in exactly the same way that his grapes did. Here’s a Google fact for today: it takes fig trees between three and five years to produce fruit.[2]
So it wasn’t so odd for three years to pass without fruit for that fig tree. The fig tree was doing exactly what fig trees do. They grow for a few years before they start to produce. Perhaps the gardener knew this, perhaps not. But something in him said, “maybe if we continue to encourage this tree, it will fruit next year.”
More likely,and to state the obvious, the gardener knew that the fig tree was not a grapevine. Fig trees and grapevines are very different plants, and you cannot expect a fig tree to act like a grapevine. Fig trees take longer to produce first fruit. By the same token, they do not require the rigorous pruning and trellising that grapes do. Grapes are not the same as figs, and that is just fine.
The fig tree got a second chance. The gardener was willing to work with the tree and encourage it, when that vineyard owner was ready to judge it permanently useless.
As with all of Jesus’ parables, there are the interpretations that are built on the most obvious reading, and there are the deeper ones that we discover when we look for the thing that was there all along and that we all missed.
This is not just a story about fruitfulness, and how the trees that do not bear fruit will be destroyed. It is also a story about second chances, about the fact that each of us need second chances.
None of us is fruitful all the time. We have our fallow times, our times of darkness and troubles, our times when we have nothing to offer the world. But somehow, the Lord keeps giving us second chances, nudging us toward fruitfulness once again. We do need that, don’t we?
And the corollary to that – you knew I’d turn this around, don’t you? – is that none of us has the right to act like the vineyard owner, judging that something or someone is useless and needs to be discarded.  If the Lord is willing to give us a second chance, if the Lord sees that each of us develops as spiritual beings at different rates and keeps on nurturing us even when it seems we will never get it, if the Lord says “one more year,” who are we to judge who is fruitful and who should be cast out into the darkness?
Amen.


[1] http://ehflaw.typepad.com/blog/2013/02/a-fig-tree-in-a-vineyard.html
[2] http://www.ehow.com/facts_7472639_long-fig-tree-produce-fruit.html